SAMs associated with this collection are no longer available. Foreword: Radiology Select Vol. 4 – Breast Cancer Screening (PDF)Deborah Levine, MD, Series Editor, Radiology Select Herbert Y. Kressel, MD, Editor, Radiology Introducing Radiology Select: Breast Cancer Screening (PDF) Constance D. Lehman, MD, PhD SECTIONS: Mammography Performance Digital Mammography Screening Mammography and Computer-aided Detection Screening in High-Risk Patients Other Screening Tools |
Icons |
|||||
Video | Audio |
Content Codes |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Mammography Performance |
|||
Performance Benchmarks for Screening Mammography
Robert D. Rosenberg, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Linn A. Abraham, Edward A. Sickles, Constance D. Lehman, Berta M. Geller, Patricia A. Carney, Karla Kerlikowske, Diana S. M. Buist, Donald L. Weaver, William E. Barlow, and Rachel Ballard-Barbash
|
|||
Evidence-based Target Recall Rates for Screening Mammography
Michael J. Schell, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Bahjat F. Qaqish, William E. Barlow, Robert D. Rosenberg, and Rebecca Smith-Bindman
|
|||
Identifying Minimally Acceptable Interpretive Performance Criteria for Screening Mammography
Patricia A. Carney, Edward A. Sickles, Barbara S. Monsees, Lawrence W. Bassett, R. James Brenner, Stephen A. Feig, Robert A. Smith, Robert D. Rosenberg, T. Andrew Bogart, Sally Browning, Jane W. Barry, Mary M. Kelly, Khai A. Tran, and Diana L. Miglioretti
|
|||
Effect of Observing Change from Comparison Mammograms on Performance of Screening Mammography in a Large Community-based Population
Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Ryan C. May, Jeanine Matuszewski, J. Michael Bowling, Molly P. Jarman, and Bruce F. Schroeder
|
|||
Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 Decades
László Tabár, Bedrich Vitak, Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Anders Cohen, Tibor Tot, Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Jean Ching-Yuan Fann, Johan Rosell, Helena Fohlin, Robert A. Smith, and Stephen W. Duffy
|
|||
Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists Characteristics Associated with Accuracy
Joann G. Elmore, Sara L. Jackson, Linn Abraham, Diana L. Miglioretti, Patricia A. Carney, Berta M. Geller, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Karla Kerlikowske, Tracy Onega, Robert D. Rosenberg, Edward A. Sickles, and Diana S. M. Buist
|
|||
Influence of Annual Interpretive Volume on Screening Mammography Performance in the United States
Diana S. M. Buist, Melissa L. Anderson, Sebastien J. P. A. Haneuse, Edward A. Sickles, Robert A. Smith, Patricia A. Carney, Stephen H. Taplin, Robert D. Rosenberg, Berta M. Geller, Tracy L. Onega, Barbara S. Monsees, Lawrence W. Bassett, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, Joann G. Elmore, Karla Kerlikowske, and Diana L. Miglioretti
|
|||
Breast Cancer Screening: From Science to Recommendation
Diana B. Petitti, Ned Calonge, Michael L. LeFevre, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Timothy J. Wilt, and J. Sanford Schwartz; For the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
|
|||
Mammography: Yet Another Challenge
Daniel B. Kopans
|
|||
The 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guidelines Ignore Important Scientific Evidence and Should Be Revised or Withdrawn
Daniel B. Kopans
|
Digital Mammography |
|||
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST
Etta D. Pisano, R. Edward Hendrick, Martin J. Yaffe, Janet K. Baum, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Jean B. Cormack, Lucy A. Hanna, Emily F. Conant, Laurie L. Fajardo, Lawrence W. Bassett, Carl J. D’Orsi, Roberta A. Jong, Murray Rebner, Anna N. A. Tosteson, and Constantine A. Gatsonis; For the DMIST Investigators Group
|
|||
Randomized Trial of Screen-Film versus Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading in Population-based Screening Program: Follow-up and Final Results of Oslo II Study
Per Skaane, Solveig Hofvind, and Arnulf Skjennald
|
|||
Breast Cancer Screening Results 5 Years after Introduction of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program
Nico Karssemeijer, Adriana M. Bluekens, David Beijerinck, Jan J. Deurenberg, Matthijs Beekman, Roelant Visser, Ruben van Engen, Annemieke Bartels-Kortland, and Mireille J. Broeders
|
|||
Calcifications in Digital Mammographic Screening: Improvement of Early Detection of Invasive Breast Cancers?
Stefanie Weigel, Thomas Decker, Eberhard Korsching, Daniela Hungermann, Werner Böcker, and Walter Heindel
|
|||
Effect of Transition to Digital Mammography on Clinical Outcomes
Catherine G. Glynn, MBBCh, MRCPI, Dione M. Farria, Barbara S. Monsees, Jennifer T. Salcman, Kimberly N. Wiele, and Charles F. Hildebolt
|
|||
Reduction in False-Positive Results after Introduction of Digital Mammography: Analysis from Four Population-based Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Spain
Maria Sala, Dolores Salas, Francesc Belvisc, Mar Sánchez, Joana Ferrer, Josefa Ibañez, Rubén Román, Francisco Ferrer, Alfonso Vega, Maria Soledad Laso and Xavier Castells
|
|||
Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study
Adriana M. J. Bluekens, Roland Holland, Nico Karssemeijer, Mireille J. M. Broeders and Gerard J. den Heeten
|
Screening Mammography and Computer-aided Detection |
|||
Computer-aided Detection in Screening Mammography: Variability in Cues
Jay A. Baker, Joseph Y. Lo, David M. Delong and Carey E. Floyd
|
|||
Computer-aided Detection with Screening Mammography in a University Hospital Setting
Robyn L. Birdwell, Parul Bandodkar and Debra M. Ikeda
|
|||
Computer-aided Detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: Prospective Study
Lisanne A. L. Khoo, Paul Taylor and Rosalind M. Given-Wilson
|
|||
Computer-aided Detection Output on 172 Subtle Findings on Normal Mammograms Previously Obtained in Women with Breast Cancer Detected at Follow-Up Screening Mammography
Debra M. Ikeda, Robyn L. Birdwell, Kathryn F. O’Shaughnessy, Edward A. Sickles and R. James Brenner
|
|||
Interpretation Time of Computer-aided Detection at Screening Mammography
Philip M. Tchou, Tamara Miner Haygood, E. Neely Atkinson, Tanya W. Stephens, Paul L. Davis, Elsa M. Arribas, William R. Geiser and Gary J. Whitman
|
|||
Mammographic Features of Breast Cancers at Single Reading with Computer-aided Detection and at Double Reading in a Large Multicenter Prospective Trial of Computer-aided Detection: CADET II
Jonathan J. James, Fiona J. Gilbert, Matthew G. Wallis, Maureen G. C. Gillan, Susan M. Astley, Caroline R. M. Boggis, Olorunsola F. Agbaje, Adam R. Brentnall and Stephen W. Duffy
|
Screening in High-Risk Patients |
|||
Cancer Yield of Mammography, MR, and US in High-Risk Women: Prospective Multi-Institution Breast Cancer Screening Study
Constance D. Lehman, Claudine Isaacs, Mitchell D. Schnall, Etta D. Pisano, Susan M. Ascher, Paul T. Weatherall, David A. Bluemke, Deborah J. Bowen, P. Kelly Marcom, Deborah K. Armstrong, Susan M. Domchek, Gail Tomlinson, Steven J. Skates and Constantine Gatsonis
|
|||
Multicenter Comparative Multimodality Surveillance of Women at Genetic-Familial High Risk for Breast Cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results
Francesco Sardanelli, Franca Podo, Giuliano D’Agnolo, Arduino Verdecchia, Mariano Santaquilani, Renato Musumeci, Giovanna Trecate, Siranoush Manoukian, Sandro Morassut, Clelia de Giacomi, Massimo Federico, Laura Cortesi, Stefano Corcione, Stefano Cirillo, and Vincenzo Marra; For the High Breast Cancer Risk Italian Trial (HIBCRIT)
|
|||
Frequency of Malignancy Seen in Probably Benign Lesions at Contrast-enhanced Breast MR Imaging: Findings from ACRIN 6667
Susan P. Weinstein, Lucy G. Hanna, Constantine Gatsonis, Mitchell D. Schnall, Mark A. Rosen, and Constance D. Lehman
|
|||
Screening Breast MR Imaging in Women with a History of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ
Janice S. Sung, Sharp F. Malak, Punam Bajaj, Rebecca Alis, D. David Dershaw, and Elizabeth A. Morris
|
|||
Mammographic, US, and MR Imaging Phenotypes of Familial Breast Cancer
Simone Schrading and Christiane K. Kuhl
|
|||
Cost-effectiveness of Breast MR Imaging and Screen-Film Mammography for Screening BRCA1 Gene Mutation Carriers
Janie M. Lee, Pamela M. McMahon, Chung Y. Kong, Daniel B. Kopans, Paula D. Ryan, Elissa M. Ozanne, Elkan F. Halpern, and G. Scott Gazelle
|
Other Screening Tools |
|||
Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience
Karen K. Lindfors, John M. Boone, Thomas R. Nelson, Kai Yang, Alexander L. C. Kwan, and DeWitt F. Miller
|
|||
Dedicated Dual-Head Gamma Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts
Deborah J. Rhodes, Carrie B. Hruska, Stephen W. Phillips, Dana H. Whaley, and Michael K. O’Connor
|
|||
Reasons Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer Refuse Breast MR Imaging Screening: ACRIN 6666
Wendie A. Berg, Jeffrey D. Blume , Amanda M. Adams, Roberta A. Jong, Richard G. Barr, Daniel E. Lehrer, Etta D. Pisano, W. Phil Evans III, Mary C. Mahoney, Linda Hovanessian Larsen, Glenna J. Gabrielli, and Ellen B. Mendelson
|
|||
Analysis of Parenchymal Texture with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Comparison with Digital Mammography and Implications for Cancer Risk Assessment
Despina Kontos, Lynda C. Ikejimba, Predrag R. Bakic, Andrea B. Troxel, Emily F. Conant, and Andrew D. A. Maidment
|
|||
Occult Breast Cancer: Scintimammography with High-Resolution Breast-specific Gamma Camera in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Rachel F. Brem, Jocelyn A. Rapelyea, Gilat Zisman, Kevin Mohtashemi, Joyce Raub, Christine B. Teal, Stan Majewski, and Benjamin L. Welch
|